Skip to content

Marissa Alexander Shows How Stand Your Ground Laws Fail Black Women (Participation)

April 19, 2012

Marissa Alexander Shows How Stand Your Ground Laws Fail Black Women

Tuesday Apr 17, 2012 – by

Since news of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin’s slaying spread across the media, one thing that many have focused on has been Florida’s Stand Your Ground law, which allows those confronted by violence and fearing for their life to take potentially deadly action to protect themselves. Because of this law, Sanford police failed to arrest George Zimmerman, the man who admitted to killing Martin, because he claimed he shot the unarmed teen in self-defense.

But while the conversation around Stand Your Ground laws have centered on them being an unfair license to kill, what happens when a person actually stands their ground to protect their life?

For Marissa Alexander, standing her ground has jeopardized her freedom, as the mom of three faces 20 years in prison for protecting herself.

Nearly two years ago, Alexander had just given birth to a newborn baby when she found herself in a violent confrontation with her estranged husband. According to Alexander, her husband had a history of domestic violence and at the time of the confrontation, she had an injunction of protection against him.

On a blog supportting Alexander’s cause, she explains:

In an unprovoked jealous rage, my husband violently confronted me while using the restroom.  He assaulted me, shoving, strangling and holding me against my will, preventing me from fleeing all while I begged for him to leave.  After a minute or two of trying to escape, I was able to make it to the garage where my truck was parked, but in my haste to leave I realized my keys were missing.  I tried to open the garage but there was a mechanical failure. I was unable to leave, trapped in the dark with no way out.  For protection against further assault I retrieved my weapon; which is registered and I have a concealed weapon permit.  Trapped, no phone, I entered back into my home to either leave through another exit or obtain my cell phone.

He and my two stepsons were supposed to be exiting the house thru the front door, but he didn’t leave.  Instead he came into the kitchen that leads to the garage and realized I was unable to leave.  Instead of leaving thru the front door where his vehicle was parked outside of the garage, he came into the kitchen by himself.  I was terrified from the first encounter and feared he came to do as he had threatened.  The weapon was in my right hand down by my side and he yelled, “Bitch I will kill you!”, and charged toward me.  In fear and desperate attempt, I lifted my weapon up, turned away and discharged a single shot in the wall up in the ceiling.

Unfortunately for Alexander, her husband called the police and accused her of shooting at him and his sons, and she was arrested and charged with three counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon with no intent to harm, which can carry a 20-year sentence in prison.

Despite her well-documented abuse claims, and her husband’s admission that he was the aggressor, a judge dismissed Alexander’s motion to receive immunity under Florida’s Stand Your Ground statue and she is currently awaiting trial.

Alexander says that she is a “law abiding citizen” and just wants to tell her story in the hopes of bringing attention to her case.

“A step further and more importantly is in light of recent news, is justice for all include everyone, regardless of gender, race or aristocratic dichotomies,” she explains. ” I simply want my story heard, reviewed and the egregious way in which my case was handled from start to finish serve as an eye opener for all and especially those responsible for upholding judicial affairs.”

Find out more about Marissa Alexander’s story on the Justice for Marissa blog. 


From → Participation

  1. Alex Clark permalink

    I think the “stand your ground law” is a perfectly good law in my opinion. If an intruder broke into my house in the middle of the night, I would want the right to have to defend myself in any means necessary. Of course, there are instances when this law is not so good (Trayvon Martin Case). In regards to this article, the woman was put in an unfortunate situation. I hope the judge reviews her case again so she can continue her innocent plea.

    • Hailey Schur permalink

      I couldn’t agree more with Alex. This law is good for every citizen. If you don’t want to get shot don’t go breaking into private property that isn’t yours!

  2. Alex: Your example of the house is covered under the Castle doctrine. stand your ground goes well beyond that

  3. Amanda Fu permalink

    I feel like the Stand Your Ground law has not been used for what it was meant to do. It was meant to give people who needed to protect themeselves immunity if they ever came across something they would need to protect themeselves against right? But so far, I’ve only heard bad things about this law. Just like the standardized tests, it sounds like this law is doing more bad than good, but with intentions of doing something good.

    Especially in the case of Marissa Alexander, it seems wrong to me that the judge dismissed the case against her even though she already had filed several claims about her husband being abusive! You’d think that they would take that under consideration and she didn’t even shoot at her husband and the kids. I especially wouldn’t think that a new mother who just gave birth would want to harm other kids and the sentence sounds ridiculously high for someone with no intent to harm.

  4. Kyla Chappell permalink

    I believe the “Stand your Ground” Laws are completely necessary and rightful to all citizens. Like Alex explained, if an intruder broke into my harm, and I was scared for my safety, I would want my right to defend myself without being criminally charged. In this specific case, I feel as though this woman had every right to “stand her ground” considering the assault that took place moments before, and the threat she received. Any sane person would act the same, she didn’t shoot at him, whereas most people would. I think she is being wrongly convicted, as she was merely defending herself.

  5. Brittany dyess permalink

    I’m not understanding why she iz still in custody or even on trial for a 20 year,she didn’t shoot him,two he was attacking her,3 its self.defense and her firearm was.registered??
    I pray for her situation because that’s messed up

  6. Victoria Kolytiris permalink

    The “Stand Your Ground” Law is definately is not being used for what it is supposed to be for. I think one should have a right to defend themselves in their own house but this goes far beyond that. Zimmerman had no right to KILL a young boy because he felt a little threatened and still get away with it. I think if i was her I would have done the same even if it was my husband. She is for sure being convicted wrongly and unfairly when she was scared for her life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: